Analysis of social and psychological factors influencing the treatment of patients with chronic kidney disease under the regular epidemic prevention and control of coronavirus disease 2019.

Objective To explore the sociodemographic and psychological factors influencing the continuity of treatment of patients with chronic kidney disease under the regular epidemic prevention and control of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Methods A total of 277 patients with chronic kidney disease who were admitted to Department of Nephrology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University (Second Military Medical University) from Apr. 2020 to Mar. 2021 were enrolled and divided into 3 groups: non-dialysis group (n=102), hemodialysis (HD) group (n=108), and peritoneal dialysis (PD) group (n=67). All patients were investigated by online and offline questionnaires, including self-designed basic situation questionnaire, self-rating anxiety scale (SAS), and self-rating depression scale (SDS). The general sociodemographic data, anxiety and depression of the 3 groups were compared, and the influence of sociodemographic and psychological factors on the interruption or delay of treatment was analyzed by binary logistic regression model. Results There were significant differences in age distribution, marital status, occupation, medical insurance type, caregiver type, whether there was an urgent need for hospitalization and whether treatment was delayed or interrupted among the 3 groups (all P0.05). The average SAS score of 65 PD patients was 38.15+/-15.83, including 53 (81.5%) patients without anxiety, 7 (10.8%) patients with mild anxiety, and 5 (7.7%) patients with moderate to severe anxiety. The average SAS score of 104 patients in the HD group was 36.86+/-14.03, including 81 (77.9%) patients without anxiety, 18 (17.3%) patients with mild anxiety, and 5 (4.8%) patients with moderate to severe anxiety. There were no significant differences in the mean score of SAS or anxiety severity grading between the 2 groups (both P0.05). The mean SDS scores of 65 PD patients were 53.42+/-13.30, including 22 (33.8%) patients without depression, 21 (32.3%) patients with mild depression, and 22 (33.8%) patients with moderate to severe depression. The mean SDS scores of 104 patients in the HD group were 50.79+/-10.76, including 36 (34.6%) patients without depression, 56 (53.8%) patients with mild depression, and 12 (11.6%) patients with moderate to severe depression. There were no significant differences in mean SDS scores or depression severity grading between the 2 groups (both P0.05). The results of intra-group comparison showed that the incidence and severity of depression were higher than those of anxiety in both groups. Multivariate binary logistic regression analysis showed that high school education level (odds ratio OR=5.618, 95% confidence interval CI) 2.136-14.776, P0.01), and unmarried (OR=6.916, 95% CI 1.441-33.185, P=0.016), divorced (OR= 5.588, 95% CI 1.442-21.664, P=0.013), urgent need for hospitalization (OR=8.655, 95% CI 3.847-19.476, P0.01) could positively promote the continuity of treatment in maintenance dialysis patients under the regular epidemic prevention and control of COVID-19. In the non-dialysis group, no sociodemographic and psychological factors were found to be associated with the interruption or delay of treatment (P0.05). Conclusion Education, marital status, and urgent need for hospitalization are correlated with the continuity of treatment in patients with chronic kidney disease on maintenance dialysis.Copyright © 2022, Second Military Medical University Press. All rights reserved.

The Impact of Dialysis Sessions on Blood Levels of D-dimer among Chronic Kidney Disease Patients Infected with COVID-19

Coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) pandemic is a real challenge to our communities worldwide, exerting a high socioeconomic impact. The disease is associated with a great deal of co-agulation cascade disorder, with a considerable increase in D-dimer concentration in blood. Objec-tives: To assess the impact of dialysis session frequency on blood levels of D-dimer among CKD patients infected with COVID-19. Patients and Methods: The study included 40 CKD patients (22 males and 18 females) infected with COVID-19, who attended the Artificial Kidney Unit at Al Hussein Teaching Hospital, Thi-Qar, Iraq for regular dialysis. They were divided into two groups;Group I: 20 CKD patients who had COVID-19. They underwent one hemodialysis session per week. The second group, which included 20 CKD patients infected with COVID-19 underwent three dialysis sessions per week. Plasma levels of D-dimer were measured one day before the start of the study and one day after three weeks in both groups. Result(s): The results of the present study re-vealed that CKD patients infected with COVID-19 who underwent three dialysis session per week (Group II) had a significant drop in blood D-dimer level at the end of three weeks in comparison to the initial values. Furthermore, the decrease in blood D-dimer level was significantly higher among CKD patients with COVID-19 who underwent three dialysis sessions per week (Group II) in comparison to COVID-19 infected CKD patients who underwent single dialysis sessions per week (Group I). Conclusion(s): CKD patients with COVID-19 have an elevated blood level of D-dimer. Increasing the frequency of hemodialysis plays an essential role in lowering the serum D-dimer level among these patients.Copyright © 2023, Colegio de Farmaceuticos de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. All rights reserved.

Kidney dysfunction and in-hospital complications in patients with acute cardiovascular pathology infected with COVID-19

This study aimed to assess kidney function and its significance for the development of in-hospital complications in patients hospitalized with acute cardiovascular pathology infected with COVID-19. Methods. This prospective cohort single-center study included 139 patients with acute cardiovascular pathology diagnosed with COVID-19. Sixty-nine (49.6%) patients had acute coronary syndrome (47 with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), 33 (23.7%) patients had hypertension urgencies, 24 (17.3%) patients had acute decompensated heart failure, 9 (6.5%) patients had tachysystolic paroxysms of atrial fibrillation, 2 (1.4%) patients had an acute pulmonary embolism, and 2 (1.4%) patients had syncope. The mean age was 67.9±12.7 years, and 70 (50.4%) patients were male. Arterial hypertension was present in 87.1% of patients, diabetes mellitus in 20.9%, congestive heart failure in 30.9%, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in 9.4%, AMI in 20.1%, and ischemic stroke in 9.4%. Results. The initial creatinine level was 110.7±66.1 μmol/l and eGFR (CKD-EPI) was 63.3±20.3 ml/min/1.73m2 (eGFR<60 ml/min/1.73m2 was diagnosed in 46.0% of the patients). The patients with eGFR<60 ml/min/1.73m2 were older, more often female, frequently had a history of atrial fibrillation, had lower hemoglobin and blood pressure on admission, a greater number of complications (need for noninvasive ventilation, inotropic therapy), and higher in-hospital mortality (25.0% vs. 5.3 %, p=0.002). Acute kidney injury, which was evaluated according to KDIGO criteria (increase in creatinine level ≥ 26.5 μmol/l within 48 hours or ≥ 1.5 times within 7 days) was observed in 21 (15.4%) patients (12.0% in patients with eGFR≥60 ml/min/1.73m2 and 18.8% with eGFR<60 ml/min/1.73m2, p<0.05). These patients did not differ significantly in basic clinical and anamnestic data from patients without AKI but had lower spO2 on admission (86.9±11.2% vs. 93.4±5.0%, p=0.016). Patients with AKI had a significantly higher number of in-hospital complications: acute hypoxic delirium (47.6% vs. 8.7%, p=0.003), venous thromboembolism (14.3% vs. 0.9%, p=0.070), death from all causes (47.6% vs. 7.0%, p=0.002) and more often required organ supportive therapy: non-invasive/invasive pulmonary ventilation (52.4% vs. 11.3%, p<0.001), inotropic therapy (57.1% versus 5.2%, p<0.001). Using the simplified criterion of AKI, the category of patients at high risk for hospital complications and death could also be distinguished (37.9% vs. 8.2%, p=0.004). Vaccination against COVID-19 (at least 2 weeks before hospitalization) prevented the development of AKI (16.5% vs. 5.0%, p=0.046) and tended to prevent in-hospital mortality (15.7% vs. 5.0%, p=0.076). Conclusions. Renal dysfunction in patients with acute cardiovascular pathology infected with COVID-19 is associated with in-hospital complications and can be prevented by prophylactic vaccination. © Y. Lutai, O. Parkhomenko, O. Irkin, D. Khomyakov, 2023. All rights reserved.

COVID-19 in patients with advanced stages of diabetic kidney disease: new onset renal replacement therapy as one of the predictors of adverse outcome

Background: patients with Diabetes Mellitus 2 (DM2) and advanced stages of Diabetic Kidney Disease (DKD) are at high risk for the lethal outcome of COVID-19. The causes of high mortality and the prognostic signifi cance of the new onset of renal replacement therapy (hemodialysis de novo, HD de novo) among these patients are still points of debate. Aim: the identifi cation of risk factors (RF) of lethal outcome in patients with DKD 4-5D stages and evaluation of the prognostic value of HD de novo in patients not receiving HD at the time of hospital admission. Methods: the patients with COVID-19 and advanced stages of DKD were included in a retrospective observational study from 04.01. to 10.30.2020. The endpoints were the outcome of hospitalization (discharge/death) and HD de novo initiation during the inpatient course. Several demographic, DM2, DKD, and COVID-19-associated signs and laboratory parameters were analyzed as independent variables. The subgroup of patients with HD de novo was selected from the general cohort. Results: 120 patients with DKD 4-5D stages were included, with a mean age of 69±10 y, females - 52%. Initially, the observation cohort was divided into subgroups: DKD 4-5 and DKD 5D on maintenance hemodialysis (MHD). The mortality among patients with DKD 4-5 was comparable with the patients on MHD (38,2% vs 38,5%, р=0,975). The independent predictors of lethal outcome in group DKD 4-5 were: age ≥65 y (OR 12,30;95% CI 1,40-33,5;р=0,009), initial prandial glycemia ≥10 mmol/l (OR 14,5;95% CI 3,7-55,4;р<0,001), albuminemia at admission ≤35 g/l (OR 5,17;95% CI 1,52-17,50;р=0,012), Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) ≥10 (OR 6,69;95% CI 1,95-23,00;р=0,002), News2 >4 at admission (OR 7,58;95% CI 2,18-26,37;р=0,001), lung damage CT 3-4 at admission (OR 3,39;95% CI 1,09-10,58;р=0,031). In subgroup DKD 5D the independent predictors of lethal outcome were prandial glycemia at admission ≥10 mmol/l (OR 28,5;95% CI 7,1-33,5;р<0,001), lung damage at admission CT 3-4 (OR 8,35;95% CI 2,64-26,40;р<0,001), CCI ≥10 (OR 6,00;95% CI 1,62-22,16;р=0,006). To determine the risk of lethal outcome predictive models were created using identifi ed risk factors and variables. The predictive value for DKD 4-5 group was 93%, and for DKD 5D was 88%. The assessment of the overall predictive value of these models was carried out using ROC analysis. The mortality among patients with DKD 4-5 without HD de novo was 21,6% vs 72,2% in patients with initiated HD de novo (р<0,001). The independent predictors of HD de novo during the inpatient course were: prandial glycemia at admission ≥10 mmol/l (OR 3,38;95% CI 1,04-10,98;р=0,050), albuminemia at admission ≤35 г/л (OR 3,41;95% CI 1,00-11,55;р=0,050), News2 >4 at admission (OR 5,60;95% CI 1,67-19,47;р=0,006), eGFR ≤20 ml/min/1,73 m2 at admission (OR 4,24;95% CI 1,29-13,99;р=0,020). HD de novo was identifi ed as an independent predictor of adverse outcomes (OR 9,42;95% CI 2,58-34,4;р=0,001). The analysis of cumulative survival demonstrated comparable results in DKD 4-5 without HD de novo group and DKD 5D group. The cumulative 55-day survival in the subgroup with HD de novo was only 10%. Conclusion: the need to start HD de novo is one of the most powerful predictors of adverse outcomes of COVID-19 in patients with advanced DKD. The comparable mortality rate in DKD 4-5 and DKD 5D groups is due to extremely high mortality in the subgroup with HD de novo. The strict control and correction of HD de novo risk factors could turn them into modifi able ones and thus improve the survival prognosis of patients with advanced stages of DKD. © 2023 JSC Vidal Rus. All rights reserved.

The Associations of Antihypertensive Medications, Steroids, Beta Blockers, Statins and Comorbidities with COVID-19 Outcomes in Patients with and without Chronic Kidney Disease: A Retrospective Study

(1) Background: Data on COVID-19 outcomes and disease course as a function of different medications used to treat cardiovascular disease and chronic kidney disease (CKD), as well as the presence of different comorbidities in primarily Black cohorts, are lacking. (2) Methods: We conducted a retrospective medical chart review on 327 patients (62.6% Black race) who were admitted to the Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, MI. Group differences (CKD vs. non-CKD) were compared using the Pearson χ2 test. We conducted univariate and multivariate regression analyses for factors contributing to death during hospitalization due to COVID-19 (primary outcome) and ICU admission (secondary outcome), adjusting for age, sex, different medications, and comorbidities. A sub-analysis was also completed for CKD patients. (3) Results: In the fully adjusted model, a protective effect of ACEi alone, but not in combination with ARB or CCB, for ICU admission was found (OR = 0.400, 95% CI [0.183–0.874]). Heart failure was significantly associated with the primary outcome (OR = 4.088, 95% CI [1.1661–14.387]), as was COPD (OR = 3.747, 95% CI [1.591–8.828]). (4) Conclusions: Therapeutic strategies for cardiovascular disease and CKD in the milieu of different comorbidities may need to be tailored more prudently for individuals with COVID-19, especially Black individuals. [ FROM AUTHOR] Copyright of COVID is the property of MDPI and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full . (Copyright applies to all s.)

Diabetic Kidney Disease and Covid-19

Diabetic kidney disease (DKD) is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with diabetes. Moreover, chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD) in these patients. Of interest, DKD patients express a chronic systemic inflammation that contributes to the immunosuppressed state that accounts for infectious complications. Hospital admissions and mortality from the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic are spreading throughout the world. Risk factors for severe COVID-19 include diabetes, CKD, and CVD. In susceptible patients, preexisting immune deficiency and other chronic conditions can promote the well-known "cytokine storm” observed in COVID-19. As with many other organs, the kidneys are susceptible to be affected since they express the ACE2 receptor (SARS-CoV-2 cell receptor). Beyond the reported acute kidney involvement, growing evidence showed that CKD progression might be accelerated due to the associated chronic endothelial dysfunction observed in COVID-19 patients. This chapter explores the existing evidence regarding the COVID-19 pandemic crashing with the old diabetes pandemic. Likewise, a special approach to the possible benefits of antidiabetic and other drugs is discussed. © Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2014, 2022.

The Association between COVID-19 Infection and Kidney Damage in a Regional University Hospital.

Background and Objectives: Kidneys are one of the main targets for SARS-CoV-2. Early recognition and precautionary management are essential in COVID-19 patients due to the multiple origins of acute kidney injury and the complexity of chronic kidney disease management. The aims of this research were to investigate the association between COVID-19 infection and renal injury in a regional hospital. Materials and Methods: The data of 601 patients from the Vilnius regional university hospital between 1 January 2020 and 31 March 2021 were collected for this cross-sectional study. Demographic data (gender, age), clinical outcomes (discharge, transfer to another hospital, death), length of stay, diagnoses (chronic kidney disease, acute kidney injury), and laboratory test data (creatinine, urea, C-reactive protein, potassium concentrations) were collected and analyzed statistically. Results: Patients discharged from the hospital were younger (63.18 ± 16.02) than those from the emergency room (75.35 ± 12.41, p < 0.001), transferred to another hospital (72.89 ± 12.06, p = 0.002), or who died (70.87 ± 12.83, p < 0.001). Subsequently, patients who died had lower creatinine levels on the first day than those who survived (185.00 vs. 311.17 µmol/L, p < 0.001), and their hospital stay was longer (Spearman's correlation coefficient = -0.304, p < 0.001). Patients with chronic kidney disease had higher first-day creatinine concentration than patients with acute kidney injury (365.72 ± 311.93 vs. 137.58 ± 93.75, p < 0.001). Patients with acute kidney injury and chronic kidney disease complicated by acute kidney injury died 7.81 and 3.66 times (p < 0.001) more often than patients with chronic kidney disease alone. The mortality rate among patients with acute kidney injury was 7.79 (p < 0.001) times higher than among patients without these diseases. Conclusions: COVID-19 patients who developed acute kidney injury and whose chronic kidney disease was complicated by acute kidney injury had a longer hospital stay and were more likely to die.

A Third Dose of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccine Improves Immune Response in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients.

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients have an increased risk of morbidity and mortality following SARS-CoV-2 infection. Vaccination in these patients is prioritized, and monitoring of the immune response is paramount to define further vaccination strategies. This prospective study included a cohort of 100 adult CKD patients: 48 with kidney transplant (KT) and 52 on hemodialysis without prior COVID-19. The patients were assessed for humoral and cellular immune responses after four months of an anti-SARS-CoV-2 primary two-dose vaccination scheme (CoronaVac or BNT162b2) and one month after a booster third dose of BNT162b2 vaccine. We identified poor cellular and humoral immune responses in the CKD patients after a primary vaccination scheme, and these responses were improved by a booster. Robust polyfunctional CD4+ T cell responses were observed in the KT patients after a booster, and this could be attributed to a higher proportion of the patients having been vaccinated with homologous BNT162b2 schemes. However, even after the booster, the KT patients exhibited lower neutralizing antibodies, attributable to specific immunosuppressive treatments. Four patients suffered severe COVID-19 despite three-dose vaccination, and all had low polyfunctional T-cell responses, underscoring the importance of this functional subset in viral protection. In conclusion, a booster dose of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine in CKD patients improves the impaired humoral and cellular immune responses observed after a primary vaccination scheme.

Evaluation of Plasma Biomarkers to Predict Major Adverse Kidney Events in Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19.

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Patients hospitalized with COVID-19 are at increased risk for major adverse kidney events (MAKE). We sought to identify plasma biomarkers predictive of MAKE in patients hospitalized with COVID-19. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: A total of 576 patients hospitalized with COVID-19 between March 2020 and January 2021 across 3 academic medical centers. EXPOSURE: Twenty-six plasma biomarkers of injury, inflammation, and repair from first available blood samples collected during hospitalization. OUTCOME: MAKE, defined as KDIGO stage 3 acute kidney injury (AKI), dialysis-requiring AKI, or mortality up to 60 days. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: Cox proportional hazards regression to associate biomarker level with MAKE. We additionally applied the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and random forest regression for prediction modeling and estimated model discrimination with time-varying C index. RESULTS: The median length of stay for COVID-19 hospitalization was 9 (IQR, 5-16) days. In total, 95 patients (16%) experienced MAKE. Each 1 SD increase in soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor 1 (sTNFR1) and sTNFR2 was significantly associated with an increased risk of MAKE (adjusted HR [AHR], 2.30 [95% CI, 1.86-2.85], and AHR, 2.26 [95% CI, 1.73-2.95], respectively). The C index of sTNFR1 alone was 0.80 (95% CI, 0.78-0.84), and the C index of sTNFR2 was 0.81 (95% CI, 0.77-0.84). LASSO and random forest regression modeling using all biomarkers yielded C indexes of 0.86 (95% CI, 0.83-0.89) and 0.84 (95% CI, 0.78-0.91), respectively. LIMITATIONS: No control group of hospitalized patients without COVID-19. CONCLUSIONS: We found that sTNFR1 and sTNFR2 are independently associated with MAKE in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 and can both also serve as predictors for adverse kidney outcomes. PLAIN-LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Patients hospitalized with COVID-19 are at increased risk for long-term adverse health outcomes, but not all patients suffer long-term kidney dysfunction. Identification of patients with COVID-19 who are at high risk for adverse kidney events may have important implications in terms of nephrology follow-up and patient counseling. In this study, we found that the plasma biomarkers soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor 1 (sTNFR1) and sTNFR2 measured in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 were associated with a greater risk of adverse kidney outcomes. Along with clinical variables previously shown to predict adverse kidney events in patients with COVID-19, both sTNFR1 and sTNFR2 are also strong predictors of adverse kidney outcomes.

Acute kidney disease following COVID-19 vaccination: a single-center retrospective study.

Background: Rare cases of de novo or relapsed kidney diseases associated with vaccination against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have been increasingly reported. The aim of this study was to report the incidence, etiologies, and outcomes of acute kidney disease (AKD) following COVID-19 vaccination. Methods: This retrospective study extracted cases from renal registry of a single medical center from 1 March 2021 to 30 April 2022, prior to the significant surge in cases of the Omicron variant of COVID-19 infection in Taiwan. Adult patients who developed AKD after COVID-19 vaccination were included. We utilized the Naranjo score as a causality assessment tool for adverse vaccination reactions and charts review by peer nephrologists to exclude other causes. The etiologies, characteristics, and outcomes of AKD were examined. Results: Twenty-seven patients (aged 23 to 80 years) with AKD were identified from 1,897 vaccines (estimated rate of 13.6 per 1000 patient-years within the renal registry). A majority (77.8%) of vaccine received messenger RNA-based regimens. Their median (IQR) Naranjo score was 8 (6-9) points, while 14 of them (51.9%) had a definite probability (Naranjo score ≥ 9). The etiologies of AKD included glomerular disease (n = 16) consisting of seven IgA nephropathy, four anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies-associated glomerulonephritis (AAN), three membranous glomerulonephritis, two minimal change diseases, and chronic kidney disease (CKD) with acute deterioration (n = 11). Extra-renal manifestations were found in four patients. Over a median (IQR) follow-up period of 42 (36.5-49.5) weeks, six patients progressed to end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). Conclusion: Besides glomerulonephritis (GN), the occurrence of AKD following COVID-19 vaccination may be more concerning in high-risk CKD patients receiving multiple doses. Patients with the development of de novo AAN, concurrent extra-renal manifestations, or pre-existing moderate to severe CKD may exhibit poorer kidney prognosis.

Ramadan fasting in people with diabetes and chronic kidney disease (CKD) during the COVID-19 pandemic: The DaR global survey.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The DaR Global survey was conducted to observe the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the intentions to fast and the outcomes of fasting in people with diabetes and chronic kidney disease (CKD). METHODS: Muslim people with diabetes and CKD were surveyed in 13 countries shortly after the end of Ramadan 2020, using a simple Survey Monkey questionnaire. RESULTS: This survey recruited 6736 people with diabetes, of which 707 (10.49%) had CKD. There were 118 (16.69%) people with type1 diabetes (T1D), and 589 (83.31%) were with type2 diabetes (T2D). 62 (65.24%) people with T1D and 448 (76.06%) people with T2D had fasted with CKD. Episodes of hypoglycaemia and hyperglycaemia were more frequent among people with T1D compared to T2D, 64.52% and 43.54% vs 25.22% and 22.32% respectively. Visits to the emergency department and hospitalization were more frequent among people with CKD, however no significant difference was found between people with T1D and T2D. CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic had only a minor effect on the intention to fast during Ramadan in people with diabetes and CKD. However, hypoglycaemia and hyperglycaemia were found to be more frequent, as well as emergency visits and hospital admissions among people with diabetic kidney disease. Prospective studies are needed in future to evaluate the risk indicators of hypoglycaemia and hyperglycaemia among fasting people with CKD, especially in the context of different stages of kidney disease.

Monoclonal antibodies to the interleukin-6 receptor in the treatment of COVID-19 in patients with chronic kidney disease

Interleukin-6 (IL-6) plays a key role in the pathogenesis of COVID-19, which determines the indications for the therapeutic use of its antagonists. However, data on their effectiveness and optimal timing of appointment are contradictory. The question of the possibility of their use in patients with impaired kidney function has not been studied. The aim of the study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the use of monoclonal antibodies to IL-6 receptors in COVID-19 in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) of stages 2-5 (predialysis) who do not need renal replacement therapy. Material and methods. A clinical retrospective uncontrolled single-center study included 45 patients (60% of men) with CKD stages 2-5 aged 22-95 years (median - 58 years) hospitalized with predominantly severe uncritical COVID-19 infection. Treatment of COVID-19 was carried out in accordance with the Interim guidelines for the prevention and treatment of new coronavirus infection of the Ministry of Health of Russian Federation. Results. The majority of patients (n=36;73.3%) had CKD stage 3b-5, CKD stage 2 was in 7 (15.5%) and stage 3a - in 5 (11.1%) patients. The median serum creatinine level (Cr) was 164 [131;292] mumol/l, glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was 30 [13;49] ml/min/1.73 m2, CRP 67.5 [37.2;106.75] mg/l. The introduction of monoclonal antibody to IL-6 receptors led to a decrease in the activity of the infectious process (CRP 1.55 [0.33;4.15] mg/l, p<0.001), regression of pneumonia, which did not require mechanical ventilation and hospitalization in the intensive care unit. According to the decision of the medical commission, patients were injected with monoclonal antibodies to IL-6 receptors: tocilizumab (n=36;80%), levilimab (n=2;4.4%), combined therapy with two drugs (n=7;15.5%). Therapy with IL-6 antagonists did not have a negative effect on kidney function. The levels of Cr decreased on average from 224.3+/-145.2 mmol/l at admission to 160+/-92.55 mmol/l at discharge (p<0.001), GFR increased from 32.6+/-20.9 ml/min/1.73 m2 at admission to 53+/-31.7 ml/min/1.73 m2 at discharge (p<0.001). In the majority of patients (n=36, 80%) GFR has risen, and only in 9 (20%) cases it remained approximately at the same low level. No serious adverse events have been reported with the use of IL-6 antagonists, as well as concomitant infectious complications. No deaths have been reported. The median length of stay in bed was 14 [10;19] days. Conclusion. The results of the study allow us to state that in patients with CKD, monoclonal antibodies to IL-6 receptors have a good safety profile and can be successfully used in moderate and severe forms of COVID-19, regardless of the state of kidney function.Copyright © 2022 by the authors.

Impact of Kidney Damage on the Course and Prognosis of COVID-19 Infection According to the International Registry <<Analysis of Chronic Non-Infectious Diseases Dynamics After Covid-19 Infection in Adult Patients>>

Objective. To study the course of the new coronavirus infection in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), to identify cases of acute kidney injury (AKI) in the setting of COVID-19 infection, and to access the impact of renal function on prognosis in these categories of patients during the acute phase and after hospitalization, at 3, 6, and 12 months after recovery. Materials and methods. The ACTIV and ACTIV 2 registries included men and women older than 18 years with a diagnosis of COVID-19 based on a positive PCR test for COVID-19 and a characteristic chest X-ray or computed tomography chest scan. Results. A total of 9364 patients (4404 men, average age59 [48-69]) were included in the analysis. 716 (7.67 %) patients had CKD. 8496 (90,7 %) patients had their glomerular filtration rate (GFR) measured during hospitalization, and the values were distributed as follows: >=90 ml/min/1.73m2 - in 4289 (50,5 %) patients, 89-60 ml/min/1.73m2 - in 3150 (37,1 %) patients, 59-45 ml/min/1.73m2 - in 613 (7,22 %), 44-30 ml/min/1.73m2 - in 253 (2,98 %), 29-15 ml/min/1.73m2 - in 110 (1,29 %), <15 ml/min/1.73m2 - in 81 (0,95 %) patients. 11.6 % of the subjects (n=1068) developed AKI during hospitalization. This complication was reported more often than cytokine storm (in 7.46 % in 687 patients, p<0,001) or sepsis (in 0.17 % in 16 patients, p=620). CKD increased the risk of death by 3.94-fold in patients with COVID-19 during hospitalization compared with patients without CKD. The mortality of patients with AKI during hospitalization was 3.94 times higher than the mortality of those without AKI. CKD also affected long-term survival after hospitalization: within 3 months of follow-up, the risk of death in patients with CKD increased 4.88-fold, within 6 months - 4.24-fold, after 12 months - 8.36-fold. Conclusion. The prevalence of CKD in COVID-19 patients is similar to that in the general population. AKI developed in 11.6 % of cases with COVID-19 infection and was observed more frequently in patients with overweight and hyperglycemia. CKD and AKI increased the risk of hospital mortality in patients with COVID-19. In the group of patients with CKD, mortality increased in the post-COVID period, 3, 6 and 12 months after. The high mortality rate of patients who had AKI during the coronavirus infection was observed only in the first 3 months of follow-up in the post-COVID period.Copyright © 2023 The authors.

Analysis of social and psychological factors influencing the treatment of patients with chronic kidney disease under the regular epidemic prevention and control of coronavirus disease 2019

Objective To explore the sociodemographic and psychological factors influencing the continuity of treatment of patients with chronic kidney disease under the regular epidemic prevention and control of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Methods A total of 277 patients with chronic kidney disease who were admitted to Department of Nephrology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University (Second Military Medical University) from Apr. 2020 to Mar. 2021 were enrolled and divided into 3 groups: non-dialysis group (n=102), hemodialysis (HD) group (n=108), and peritoneal dialysis (PD) group (n=67). All patients were investigated by online and offline questionnaires, including self-designed basic situation questionnaire, self-rating anxiety scale (SAS), and self-rating depression scale (SDS). The general sociodemographic data, anxiety and depression of the 3 groups were compared, and the influence of sociodemographic and psychological factors on the interruption or delay of treatment was analyzed by binary logistic regression model. Results There were significant differences in age distribution, marital status, occupation, medical insurance type, caregiver type, whether there was an urgent need for hospitalization and whether treatment was delayed or interrupted among the 3 groups (all P<0.05). The average SAS score of 65 PD patients was 38.15+/-15.83, including 53 (81.5%) patients without anxiety, 7 (10.8%) patients with mild anxiety, and 5 (7.7%) patients with moderate to severe anxiety. The average SAS score of 104 patients in the HD group was 36.86+/-14.03, including 81 (77.9%) patients without anxiety, 18 (17.3%) patients with mild anxiety, and 5 (4.8%) patients with moderate to severe anxiety. There were no significant differences in the mean score of SAS or anxiety severity grading between the 2 groups (both P>0.05). The mean SDS scores of 65 PD patients were 53.42+/-13.30, including 22 (33.8%) patients without depression, 21 (32.3%) patients with mild depression, and 22 (33.8%) patients with moderate to severe depression. The mean SDS scores of 104 patients in the HD group were 50.79+/-10.76, including 36 (34.6%) patients without depression, 56 (53.8%) patients with mild depression, and 12 (11.6%) patients with moderate to severe depression. There were no significant differences in mean SDS scores or depression severity grading between the 2 groups (both P>0.05). The results of intra-group comparison showed that the incidence and severity of depression were higher than those of anxiety in both groups. Multivariate binary logistic regression analysis showed that high school education level (odds ratio [OR]=5.618, 95% confidence interval [CI]) 2.136-14.776, P<0.01), and unmarried (OR=6.916, 95% CI 1.441-33.185, P=0.016), divorced (OR= 5.588, 95% CI 1.442-21.664, P=0.013), urgent need for hospitalization (OR=8.655, 95% CI 3.847-19.476, P<0.01) could positively promote the continuity of treatment in maintenance dialysis patients under the regular epidemic prevention and control of COVID-19. In the non-dialysis group, no sociodemographic and psychological factors were found to be associated with the interruption or delay of treatment (P>0.05). Conclusion Education, marital status, and urgent need for hospitalization are correlated with the continuity of treatment in patients with chronic kidney disease on maintenance dialysis.Copyright © 2022, Second Military Medical University Press. All rights reserved.

Association between Consumption of Dietary Supplements and Chronic Kidney Disease Prevalence: Results of the Korean Nationwide Population-Based Survey.

Despite the enormous global market of dietary supplements, the impact of dietary supplements on kidney disease is still unclear. Based on the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey from 2015 to 2017, this study evaluated the association between dietary supplement and chronic kidney disease (CKD) in 13,271 Korean adults. Among the dietary supplements, vitamin and mineral intake was the highest at 61.41%, followed by omega-3 fatty acids at 11.85%, and ginseng at 7.99%. The prevalence of CKD was significantly higher in those who consumed amino acids and proteins, ginseng and red ginseng, and herbal medicine (plant extract)-berries than in those who did not. Conversely, patients who consumed probiotic supplements had a significantly lower prevalence of CKD than those who did not. In the population without CKD risk factors or history of CKD, the prevalence of CKD was high in the group consuming ginseng and red ginseng. After adjusting for covariates, the herbal medicine (plant extract)-berry group showed an independent association with CKD incidence. In conclusion, it is suggested that dietary supplements may affect kidney function. Further large-scale cohort studies are required to elucidate the exact effects of each dietary supplement on CKD.

Importance of Confirmatory Tests for Sars-Cov-2 Infection in Hemodialysis Patients: A Multicenter Mexican Registry.

Background: Since the beginning of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic, patients with chronic kidney disease vulnerable to suffering more severe COVID-19 disease and worse outcomes have been identified. Objectives: Our study's aim was to determine the incidence, characteristics, and outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients of hemodialysis (HD) units in Mexico and to describe the availability of confirmatory testing. Methods: This study was multicentric study of 19 HD units, conducted between March 2020 and March 2021. Results: From a total of 5779 patients, 955 (16.5%) cases of suspicious COVID-19 were detected; a SARS-CoV-2 reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction test was done in only 50.6% of patients. Forty-five percentages were hospitalized and 6% required invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). There was no significant difference in mortality between confirmed (131/483) and suspicious (124/472) cases (p = 0.74). The percentage of patients in need of hospitalization, IMV, and deceased was greater than in the rest of the study population. Conclusions: The study revealed that 49.4% of the cases were not confirmed, a worrisome observation given that this is a highly vulnerable population (higher probability of contagion and worse outcomes), in which 100% of patients should have a confirmatory test.

Albuminuria-lowering effect of dapagliflozin, exenatide, and their combination in patients with type 2 diabetes: A randomized cross-over clinical study.

AIM: To evaluate the albuminuria-lowering effect of dapagliflozin, exenatide, and the combination of dapagliflozin and exenatide in patients with type 2 diabetes and microalbuminuria or macroalbuminuria. METHODS: Participants with type 2 diabetes, an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of more than 30 ml/min/1.73m2 and an urinary albumin: creatinine ratio (UACR) of more than 3.5 mg/mmol and 100 mg/mmol or less completed three 6-week treatment periods, during which dapagliflozin 10 mg/d, exenatide 2 mg/wk and both drugs combined were given in random order. The primary outcome was the percentage change in UACR. Secondary outcomes included blood pressure, HbA1c, body weight, extracellular volume, fractional lithium excretion and renal haemodynamic variables as determined by magnetic resonance imaging. RESULTS: We enrolled 20 patients, who completed 53 treatment periods in total. Mean percentage change in UACR from baseline was -21.9% (95% CI: -34.8% to -6.4%) during dapagliflozin versus -7.7% (95% CI: -23.5% to 11.2%) during exenatide and -26.0% (95% CI: -38.4% to -11.0%) during dapagliflozin-exenatide treatment. No correlation was observed in albuminuria responses between the different treatments. Numerically greater reductions in systolic blood pressure, body weight and eGFR were observed during dapagliflozin-exenatide treatment compared with dapagliflozin or exenatide alone. Renal blood flow and effective renal plasma flow (ERPF) did not significantly change with either treatment regimen. However, all but four and two patients in the dapagliflozin and dapagliflozin-exenatide groups, respectively, showed reductions in ERPF. The filtration fraction did not change during treatment with dapagliflozin or exenatide, and decreased during dapagliflozin-exenatide treatment (-1.6% [95% CI: -3.2% to -0.01%]; P = .048). CONCLUSIONS: In participants with type 2 diabetes and albuminuria, treatment with dapagliflozin, exenatide and dapagliflozin-exenatide reduced albuminuria, with a numerically larger reduction in the combined dapagliflozin-exenatide treatment group.

Urinary proteomics combined with home blood pressure telemonitoring for health care reform trial-First progress report.

High blood pressure (BP) and type-2 diabetes (T2DM) are forerunners of chronic kidney disease and left ventricular dysfunction. Home BP telemonitoring (HTM) and urinary peptidomic profiling (UPP) are technologies enabling risk stratification and personalized prevention. UPRIGHT-HTM (NCT04299529) is an investigator-initiated, multicenter, open-label, randomized trial with blinded endpoint evaluation designed to assess the efficacy of HTM plus UPP (experimental group) over HTM alone (control group) in guiding treatment in asymptomatic patients, aged 55-75 years, with ≥5 cardiovascular risk factors. From screening onwards, HTM data can be freely accessed by all patients and their caregivers; UPP results are communicated early during follow-up to patients and caregivers in the intervention group, but at trial closure in the control group. From May 2021 until January 2023, 235 patients were screened, of whom 53 were still progressing through the run-in period and 144 were randomized. Both groups had similar characteristics, including average age (62.0 years) and the proportions of African Blacks (81.9%), White Europeans (16.7%), women 56.2%, home (31.2%), and office (50.0%) hypertension, T2DM (36.4%), micro-albuminuria (29.4%), and ECG (9.7%) and echocardiographic (11.5%) left ventricular hypertrophy. Home and office BP were 128.8/79.2 mm Hg and 137.1/82.7 mm Hg, respectively, resulting in a prevalence of white-coat, masked and sustained hypertension of 40.3%, 11.1%, and 25.7%. HTM persisted after randomization (48 681 readings up to 15 January 2023). In conclusion, results predominantly from low-resource sub-Saharan centers proved the feasibility of this multi-ethnic trial. The COVID-19 pandemic caused delays and differential recruitment rates across centers.

Occurrence of comorbid diseases in patients after COVID-19.

The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the potential impact of this disease on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Patients with established cardiovascular (CV) disease are at increased risk of severe infection and hospital-acquired adverse outcomes. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence and characteristics of comorbidities in COVID-19 patients. We analyzed data from 220 patients who previously contracted COVID-19. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software. The average age of the patients was 54.6 ± 11.4 years, and arterial hypertension (AH) was the most common comorbidity, affecting 55% of patients. Obesity was observed in one-third of patients, while coronary heart disease (CHD) and coronary heart failure (CHF) were reported in 17.7% and 11.8% of patients, respectively. Chronic kidney disease (CKD), atrial fibrillation (AF), and obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) were less common. Cardiovascular diseases, particularly AH, were the most frequent comorbidities in COVID-19 patients. Understanding the prevalence and characteristics of comorbidities in COVID-19 patients is crucial for developing appropriate management strategies and improving clinical outcomes. Our findings highlight the importance of identifying and managing comorbidities in COVID-19 patients to reduce the risk of severe COVID-19 and improve clinical outcomes.

Post-Covid Isolated Mandibular Mucormycosis in a Patient with Chronic Kidney Disease: A Case Report.

Mucormycosis is an opportunistic fungal infection which was earlier seen only in immunocompromised patients. With the recent covid pandemic, there had been a drastic surge in cases of mucormycosis worldwide and especially in India. Here, we present an unusual case of biopsy proven invasive mandibular mucormycosis in a patient with chronic kidney disease and a history of COVID-19 infection. The patient was given low-dose amphotericin B and underwent surgical debridement with a successful outcome.